- #Nikon capture nx2 tutorial video manual
- #Nikon capture nx2 tutorial video full
- #Nikon capture nx2 tutorial video pro
- #Nikon capture nx2 tutorial video iso
Second choice from the programs I have used is Capture One Pro, which if it were not for NX2 it would be my favourite workflow. As I have a Nikon camera, I do find that the results seem to be more pleasing and very accurate renditions as opposed to some other programs in terms of finished product, probably because it is designed around the Nikon camera system in particular. NX2 being slightly more intuitive and fixes some glitches that were apparent in NX. Equally not all encompass Raw converters, which for me is crucial.įor workflow together with its very useful control points for adjustments, I have used NX and now NX2.
#Nikon capture nx2 tutorial video pro
Oh and further deviance - I use a mac (MacBook pro 2.4 GH 15") and use one or two progs that are mac only.įirstly, I would say that some programs are pure workflow whilst others do a lot more in terms of image editing and this needs to be born in mind. My images are at /crisscross all D80 are processed in NX, the older ones I am gradually re-editing, so 'recent' galleries use mostly re-edits.
#Nikon capture nx2 tutorial video full
nef keeps a record of the operations, not the full content of each 'step' or layer except in a temporary cache. psd, but with files a fraction of the size. nef which then keeps all the working 'live' like. nef images I find I can do far better edits of previous camera output including Panasonic FZ7 and Canon 350D, the latter after doing as neutral as possible conversion from. Is there anyone else out there who also uses it and would value a discussion of its finer points? You can change those parameters to suit your situation but in the end they all need to come together to 'cook' a proper exposure.I never got on with Photoshop (elements) and nearly always use Nikon Capture, which is very intuitive and avoids the struggle to fully control layers.
#Nikon capture nx2 tutorial video iso
Shutter aperture and iso all need to work together and be balanced. Once you get comfortable with the relationship of shutter, aperture and iso, you won't worry so much about the shooting mode. If the pictures you took were sharp other than the ball, then leave the focus mode you have for now. You need to understand them and see what works best for you. If you are confused on how and why to pick certain shutter speeds, apertures and iso, watch this video:įocus modes are another learning project. You could use that with auto iso or you can watch the iso yourself. As mentioned, shutter priority would be good too. You pick a shutter speed and aperture and auto iso will figure out the rest.
#Nikon capture nx2 tutorial video manual
I would suggest manual mode and auto iso. The speeds you will need to freeze the ball will be plenty fast enough to not show any shake from hand holding.ĭifferent ways to get the results you want. › See More: Nikon d7500 capturing soccer action I have bought also the Nikon D7500 book for dummies but that is good to a point but even that swamps me with technical details, any help, tips etc will be very much appreciated. What is the best shutter speed for capturing a football match? What is the best ISO, most of the matches are played in daylight more often in bright sunlight. I am on Auto-focus for camera and lens, is this correct. I haven’t a tripod but do have an unused monopod but not confident to use it yet. My initial results I think have been ok but what i noticed in the playback photos the ball is often captured blurred. I am lucky to have access to take photos on the pitch behind the goal. I have recently brought a Nikon d7500 together with a Tamron 70-210mm F/4 model HA034 zoom lens as recommended by the photo shop where I bought the camera. I am a novice and a “technophobe” complete amateur. Hiya I wonder if anyone can help me regarding capturing Football Action.
0 kommentar(er)
